Submitted by shelley on Wed, 2012-03-14 19:08
Not only is Missouri home to the largest number of puppy mills in the country, but there's effort underway to open the nation's first horse slaughterhouse here.
The infamous Sue Wallis, who has been a leading advocate for bringing horse slaughter back to this country, first introduced the idea of converting a vacant warehouse into a horse slaughter plant near Mountain Grove.
At a public meeting on the proposed plan, the Community Preservation Project's MacPerson aggressively challenged the idea of bringing in a slaughter house. She provided a fact list about problems with the plant, and rallied strong support in opposition.
Submitted by shelley on Wed, 2011-10-26 16:45
I have a draft of the ACFA rules after the modification by the "Missouri Solution". These are draft until vetted by the Secretary of State.
The Humane Society of the US, the ASPCA, and the Best Friends Society had mixed reviews of the new rules. On the plus side, a veterinarian annual exam must be physical, not visual. In addition, the new rules do at least address some of the original concerns, such as providing a definition of what a "severe" illness or injury is, and what is meant by "extreme" weather conditions.
Submitted by shelley on Sat, 2011-10-15 10:36
The USDA APHIS division denied me access to the August 2nd inspection for Rabbit Ridge because Donald Schrage is appealing the inspection findings.
This is in response to your Freedom of Information Act request for the August 2, 2011, Inspection
Report on Rabbit Ridge Kennel, Customer No. 4411, Certificate No. 43-A-1957. Your request was
received in our office on September 6, 2011, and assigned case number 11-822.
Animal Care employees have advised this office that the inspection report you are requesting is
currently under appeal by the licensee, and as such it is not available for release at this present time.
Submitted by shelley on Sat, 2011-10-08 09:02
The Missouri Department of Agriculture has finalized the rules based on the passage of SB 161.1. They managed to go through thousands of written comments and finalize the rules in a week's time. Must be a record.
The rules actually listed at the MDA are still the old rules. I have no idea when the Department is actually going to post the new ones. I would have expected a link with the news release.
In the meantime, as far as we know, shelters are still being charged the same fee as commercial breeders. This on top of the fact that the State is providing funding for the professional breeders to make whatever meager changes are necessary to meet the new rules.
Submitted by shelley on Tue, 2011-09-27 12:20
Following is the letter I sent to Drs. Woods and Hickam.
Subject: Commentary on proposed commercial dog breeding regulations
Dear Doctor Woods and Hickam:
I appreciate this opportunity to provide commentary on the proposed new rules to be added to the Animal Care Facilities Act (related to Senate Bill 161.1). Following are my requested clarifications and modifications for these rules.
1. In the section defining "Necessary veterinary care", please provide further clarification that the once a year examination be a hands-on physical examination, and not a visual inspection. A visual inspection is not sufficient in order to determine the dog's health.
Submitted by shelley on Tue, 2011-09-27 10:50
HSUS has provided a sample letter that can be used for comments on the new "Missouri Solution" rules. The organization not only asks for clarification of the vet requirement, but several other rules, too.
Your Message
Comments in response to proposed commercial dog breeding regulations
To Whom It May Concern [Decision Maker],
I appreciate the opportunity to provide commentary on the proposed commercial dog breeding regulations drafted pursuant to Senate Bill 161. I am writing to ask that the regulations be modified in the following ways:
Submitted by shelley on Tue, 2011-09-20 18:53
updated
This is an alert that was put out by the Missouri Alliance for Animal Legislation (MAAL) and the Humane Society of Missouri. We'll get into "I told you so"s at some later time. Right now, we all have to pull together to prevent this abominable action.
One of the regulations agreed to with the "Missouri Solution" was that each dog at a breeder must be physically examined annually by a veterinarian. The Proposition B rules that would have required that injuries and illnesses be treated by a veterinarian were removed, but at least this one minimal requirement was left.
The dog breeders agreed to this. Their representatives signed on to this.
Submitted by shelley on Thu, 2011-08-18 07:50
updated
Several Tea Party pundits have jumped on the media bandwagon for Debe Bell and the Six Bells Rabbits.
"There was no warrant", they claim, based solely on what they were told by Bell (never bothering to fact check).
"The rabbits were in great shape!", they shouted, again based on what they were told by Bell (assuming that Bell was telling the truth, while a dozen or so veterinarians, animal care personnel, and sheriff's department personnel were all lying).
Well, nothing like a few facts to show how foolish these people are.
In the sidebar to the story is a link to both the warrant and a slideshow of the conditions on Bell's farm. You better have a strong stomach before clicking the link to the slideshow.
The sad thing is, many puppy (and bunny) mills in Missouri share similar conditions, but they're not being closed down.
update
Submitted by shelley on Tue, 2011-08-09 13:32
Submitted by shelley on Wed, 2011-07-13 14:34
I did hear back from the USDA regarding my FOIA request related to the Dollarhite rabbit mill case.
Since the case is still not finished, they can't release any of the investigative material. All 120 pages of it. Yeah, that tells me there's a lot more going on then has been claimed by various fact challenged Tea Party types.
What they could send me is a copy of the letter sent to the Dollarhites in 2006 (PDF) with information about becoming licensed breeders. And screenshots of the Dollarhite web site showing that the Dollarhites were selling rabbits early in 2006 (not in 2008, as they claimed).
Pages